The plan to give the jab to children ages 5 to 11 is highly irresponsible: 86% of children in the clinical trials had adverse events, some very serious

Pushing ahead with harming children for profit is both sinful and evil, from Biblical and Enlightenment perspectives.

What vaccinations will my child get this year ...
Indonesia Will Revaccinate 'Millions' of Children After ...

The City of Toronto wants to vaccinate children from ages 5 to 11, based on recommendations from Health Canada, despite the fact that there is almost no risk of death from Covid-19 to children, and even though there is a risk of vaccine injury to them. This is going to be done worldwide.

The U.S. has started to inject the young children as well, despite the fact that children have a 99.997% recovery rate from Covid-19, according to the CDC, and there are medical reports that the jab is harmful to children.

The shots for children won’t be available until November 2021. Once rolled out, it’s likely they’ll become mandatory, despite being completely unnecessary.

So what is the truth? There’s an old saying: in war, the first casualty is truth. Do not expect one side of the war (Big Pharma, the state) to be truthful. The other side of the war (humanity) is divided into warring camps by design.

Getting to the truth is difficult. The clinical trials using children are highly contentious, as you can imagine. This could be the issue that undoes the plans of the medical tyrants.

In what follows I will share the research I’ve done but ultimately, you the reader must determine for yourself, and do your own research. My objective is to provide links to articles and some arguments to consider and use.

86% of children had adverse events during clinical trials

One report regarding the clinical trials by Pfizer that are the basis of Health Canada’s decision says that 86% of the children suffered an adverse reaction.

It is based on an FDA fact sheet. Pages 29 to 34 of that sheet lists serious and non-serious adverse events. They are too numerous to note here, but include:

– Cardiac Disorders: myocarditis, pericarditis
– Gastrointestinal Disorders: diarrhea, vomiting
– Immune System Disorders: severe allergic reactions, including
anaphylaxis, and other hypersensitivity reactions
(e.g., rash, pruritus, urticaria, angioedema)
– Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue Disorders: pain in extremity (arm)
– Nervous System Disorders: syncope

This is what the report looks like:

If you look at the illnesses being report among the majority, you might think “how in the world can this be allowed to go through?” Any sane person could see that such serious side-effects (adverse events) are unwarranted, and represent a failure for the vaccine. But no, incredibly, they are pressing on and insist the shots are safe for children. Why? For profit.

This CDC chart shows that people 0 to 19 years old have a 99.997% chance of recovery from SARS-CoV-2. The mass hysteria that gripped the world for the last 1.5 years is inexplicable when looking at this chart. This is an unremarkable disease with a low mortality rate. The reason why this happened is because of mass media propaganda, deliberately creating fear so as to sell the vaccines.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is mass-hysteria-table-1-1.png
CDC recovery rates from Covid-19: 0 to 19 years is 99.997%
This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is mass-hysteria-table-2-1.png

Other communicable diseases have killed millions of people but there has never been mass hysteria over them. Why this one? It has a transmission/reproduction rate (RO) of ~2.5 on average, as compared for example to measles which is about 15 R 0. Covid-19/SARS-CoV-2 has a relatively low mortality rate of 2.5 R 0. Why this panic?

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is KM-4.png

In the U.S., a total of 478 people aged 0 to 17 years have died of COVID-19, of which 214 died in 2021 (as of Sept. 2021), according to the CDC:
for a further breakdown by age group go here:

Even though many Covid deaths were inflated, let’s say for the sake of argument that these are not and they’re entirely attributable to to Covid-19 as claimed. Even, so they would represent the smallest cause of death among children in the U.S. (presuming that the 2018 below reflects the norm).

based on New England Journal of Medicine date at

The American Academy of Pediatrics reports that “… deaths among [children] make up 0-0.27% of all COVID-19 deaths in the states reporting data. Seven states reported zero deaths among children, according to the CDC and American Academy of Pediatrics.” On average, it is 0.003%, according to teh CDC (2020), which is statistically insignificant.

How does that compare to adverse events affecting children from Covid vaccines?

Children’s Health Defense has put together the CDC’s VAERS data for us:

This week’s [9/17/2021 release date] U.S. data for 12- to 17-year-olds show:

The most recent reported deaths include a 15-year-old boy (VAERS I.D. 1498080) who previously had COVID, was diagnosed with cardiomyopathy in May 2021 and died four days after receiving his second dose of Pfizer’s vaccine on June 18, when he collapsed on the soccer field and went into ventricular tachycardia; and a 13-year-old girl (VAERS I.D. 1505250) who died after suffering a heart condition after receiving her first dose of Pfizer.

This week’s total U.S. VAERS data, from Dec. 14, 2020 to Aug. 13, 2021, for all age groups combined, show:

Read more in The Defense by Children’s Health Defense

To put a face and name to one of the deaths:

Myocarditis and pericarditis from the Pfizer jab are said to be common causes of adverse events in teens thus far. Heart inflammation – known as myocarditis – was most common among young men aged 16 and 17.

“A CDC study on 12 to 17 year-olds who got the Pfizer vaccine found 397 reports of heart inflammation.” A fact-checker, Full Fact, says of this statistic: “It’s true 397 cases of myocarditis were reported after around 8.9 million adolescents who got the vaccine.”

Can we reasonable compare the data on Covid-19 deaths from the CDC for ages 0 to 17 for 2021 to the death from the Covid vaccine during the same period, in the U.S.?

I am no statistician and statistics are notoriously difficult to compare, leading Mark Twain to quip: “there are lies, damned lies, and statistics.”

But let’s say that the 214 deaths over 9 months equals 5.9 per week for Covid deaths on average. And let us say that the VAERS reports of 15 deaths per week is the average for the U.S. (?). Add to that the point that VAERS reports are underreported, representing about 1% of the total. The ratio, then, is something like 1500 to 5.9 or 254:1 for vaccine v. Covid deaths for the U.S. for 0 to 17 years [please feel free to correct me if I’m wrong; math is not my strong suit]

If so, that would make the adverse events what’s called in risk-management analysis, low probability-high impact events, similar to nuclear accidents: they don’t happen often, but when they do, they’re devastating.

The question to ask, from a utilitarian point of view (which is the ethic underling cost-benefit analysis), is whether the risk of injury from vaccines outweighs the risk from injury from Covid-19. Among children, it can be easily be argued that the cure is more dangerous than the disease.

For this reason, the decision to give the jab to young people of any age contradicts the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation’s (JCVI) recommendation that the vaccine should not be administered to younger children, except for those with underlying health conditions.

“A precautionary approach was agreed given the very low risk of serious disease in those aged 12 to 15 years without an underlying health condition that puts them at increased risk. Given this very low risk, considerations on the potential harms and benefits of vaccination are very finely balanced,” the JCVI stated.

And yet Pfizer says it’s vaccine is safe for children. I’m sorry but how can 86% adverse events be thought of as safe?!

More and more it feels like we are in Orwell’s 1984, where the Ministry of Truth is gaslighting us to believe lies and ignore the truth.

The Pfizer clinical trials

As for the clinical trials, the parents signed up their children for this. I find that distressing. What kind of parents hand over their children to these studies? Pfizer solicits participation in their studies here. Presumably it’s paid compensation and the participants waive all liability.

Here is the link to the Pfizer study – a least what they’re presenting to the public.

Pfizer provides a guide to talk to the child about the clinical trial, using a book called Shaman’s Magic Dream (see end of article for screen shots and description). You can’t make this stuff up.

These books are meant to be read to children by adults who have signed their kids over to the clinical trials, to make the kids feel better.

The parents do it for money. They actually risk the death of their child. I wonder how many got sick and died already? They will be sacrificed on the altar of profit.

If this doesn’t wake people up to the evil that’s going, I’m not sure what will.

Will people be willing to risk the health their children for a disease that has almost zero probability of killing them just because the state tell them to?

If so, what we’re really looking at a repeat of the ancient practice of child sacrifice.

The parent knows there is a chance their child might die but takes the risk to satisfy the state. If they don’t they risk having their child taken from them, so in most cases they’ll take the risk. A gun is being put to their heads.

For its part, the state is doing this to satisfy the demands of the pharmaceutical companies to earn more profit. That is complicity with evil.

I suspect all children will eventually be forced to take it or the state will seize the children. This is already happening in some places in custody hearings, where parents are told that unless their injected (against their will) they’ll lose the child.

These vaccines will make the children ill and dependent on more an more drugs for life. It’s a great plan by Big Pharma to create a vast market — but at the cost of human health and well-being.

And it is being used for evil as well, to divide people. And pundits like this one are calling for that to happen more and for ‘re-education camps’ to incarcerate the unvaccinated. They are serious. That’s probably coming next. The model for this re-education is the Uighur re-education camps in China.

Twitter, of course, has allowed this to stay up – though it calls for mass violence (which they claim is against their “community guidelines” – but they take down conservative tweets that are relatively benign. Twitter also allowed the Taliban but cancelled President Trump.

And this is to say nothing the still unknown long-term effects of the vaccine on younger age groups could raise their risk-benefit ratio even more dramatically.

Will we eventually be in a world like that pictured in Children of Men, where no one is able to have children as a result of cytotoxins in mRNA spike proteins? Will they reduce our species’ immunity over time? What harms will these have long-term?

Children of Men | 10 Best Movies of the Decade | Rolling Stone
Children of Men

The thing about new technologies is that no one really knows what they will do, what side-effects could occur as a result of them. That is why the precautionary principle is important.

But we also know from experience that when a new technology is invented, it will be used, even if using it have devastating consequences potentially (e.g., Chernobyl and Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disasters).

This decision to go ahead is morally evil

Given what we know about the danger of the Covid shots for the young and the lack of benefit for them, I can’t imagine anything more evil.

The authorities doing this know full well it will kill and maim some children — and will make 86% of them ill in one way or another (based on the clinical trial results).

“Evil” is a loaded word, due to its Biblical connotation, related to sin – which has been defined as disobedience to God and alienation from Him.

For instance, the commandment “Thou shalt not kill” issues from the God of Abraham (G-d; Hashem) in Exodus 20:13.

Killing children is wrong, in this view, because God commands us not to; instead, the Great Commandment is to love God with all our strength, and to love one another (Mark 12:28-34).

Those who allow children to be at risk from adverse events (either short timer or long terms), and purposely ignore the almost negligible risk to them from Covid-19 and pretend this is for their health, are not loving “one another.”

Moreover, from a Biblical perspective, they are committing idolatry by worshiping the state, and giving it preference over the Moral Law, which is reflected in the Great Commandment.

The moral law thus reflected can also be defined in more secular and Enlightenment terms. A useful definition from Kant is that the moral law means obeying what reason (or what some would call conscience) tells us is right, even if authority figures may tell us otherwise.

The moral law is duty to the principle to “act that you use humanity, in your own person as well as in the person of any other, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means.

Kant’s Formula of Humanity, thus stated, means never use others as means to an end, but always treat them as ends in themselves. To use other in this way requires instrumental reason, which is a misuse of the capacity for reason. And this is evil, in Kant’s view.

To use a common example, never cheat another person as means to your own personal wealth. Treat that other person according to the Golden Rule: “do unto other as you would have them do unto you.” (Matthew 7:12).

Applied to this topic, do not use children for profit, knowing that by doing so you’ll make the unnecessarily sick.

Kant thought that reason’s proper use was to discern how to apply the moral law in practical situations. This is called practical reason, which issues from pure reason.

Pure reason a priori is something we’re all born with, which gives us the ability to tell right from wrong. The Chinese Communist Party tries to get around that by claiming that Asian values are different, but this an excuse to ignore the universality of moral law. While there are different interpretations, the underlying moral law is the same.

Kant advises us to ignore authority figures who tell us to ignore this principle (expressed formally as the Formula of Humanity or Categorical Imperative), to practice what he called autonomy of the will, the opposite of which is heteronomy of the will (obeying the will of others or an outside incentive such as fear or greed).

In other words, think for yourself, use your own reason, and do not defer to authorities if they are morally wrong.

For instance, the soldier asked to murder women and children can say no. His moral duty comes first. In the same way, our moral duty to children takes precedence over our duty to obey the state. It would therefore be wrong to obey an immoral order to do this to a child.

In fact there is no age group to which this rule should adhere, given that the unvaccinated are not the threat they’re made out to be, on which basis they’re being scapegoated unjustly. This is because asymptomatic transmission is rare. We need a universal recognition of this fact.

There is hope in the fact that Denmark and some other countries are now saying enough of all this madness, we are lifting all restrictions and “learning to live with Covid.” That’s Big Pharma’s worst nightmare.

It is always easier and thus tempting to believe authorities who tell us what to do, and to always defer to them. This tendency in human nature has always been with us, because as Kant says we are morally lazy: it’s easier to obey that think for ourselves.

And that’s true now more than ever, due to the rise of so-called “experts” and technologists who are eroding individual liberties and advancing unlimited state power through a combination of Leftist authoritarian ideological alignment and technocracy. Easier to do what your told than fight them. But the more power you give them, the more they seize until you have nothing left.

The history of abuse by state medical authorities should give one pause, but people who blindly defer don’t seem to grasp the lessons of history – even those who are supposedly educated. They just dismiss such concerns as “conspiracy theories.”

Two third of people tend to do blindly obey , even when those authorities tell us to harm others — as the Milgram experiment proved. We should aspire to be like the one third who did not obey the men in lab coats in that experiment.

Kant defines evil as knowingly putting one’s own self-interest ahead of the moral law. Evil is thus using others as means to an one’s own ends. In this case, it is putting your carer — if you’re a health official or politician – ahead of your consideration for the health and well-being of children.

We tend not to believe that our own government could purpously kill children. It seems too incredible to believe. But keep in mind how irrational they’ve been acting in the last 1.5 years: they shut down the economy and killed millions of jobs for no good reason, harming many in the process. They’ve violated all constitutional rights and freedoms with impunity, abolishing hundreds of years of judicial and political progress towards a free and just society.

They’ve been caught lying numerous times and acting like bullies, censoring legitimate scientists who disagreed. They’ve forced people take a drug that is know to have numerous adverse side-effects when natural immunity and low-cost drugs that were safer were available.

So would they purposely kill children? Yes. Bill Gates is not even hiding the fact that he wants to reduce the world’s population by 10 to 15%.

I believe the health officials doing this — such as Fauci and Dr. Tam — are knowingly sacrificing those children for the sake of their careers. They have sold their souls for power and position.

Surely this will begin to wake the majority out of their torpor, and they’ll begin to see that we’re up against medical tyranny? Or will most people (again) blindly defer to corrupt medical authorities and ignore their own reason? They have done so in Communist nations for decades. Will we really be the same?

Globalist agenda

Toronto is giving the go-ahead to the program due to approval by Health Canada, a government body run by Dr. Theresa Tam. Tam is part of the WHO, a body trying to spread globalism and using medical tyranny to do it.

The Health Canada approval issues from Pfizer’s studies the effects of the vaccine in young children in the U.S., Spain, Poland and Finland. Johnson & Johnson and Moderna have also done trials on children.

I believe that Health Canada‘s judgement and integrity are compromised by financially and political interests, which they’re putting ahead of human safety.

The more the corporate “fact-checkers” and state medical authorities frantically gaslight me with assertions of the jab’s safety, the greater my skepticism grows. And is apparently true of millions of other people as well.

If it’s so safe, why are there so many horrendous adverse vents associated with it, including the claim of 150,000 dead from it in the U.S.? And why did children suffer 86% adverse events in clinical trials?

As the White Rose resistance group asks, “Have you noticed this is the only crisis that needs an advertising campaign paired with a constant barrage of repetitive brainwashing propaganda on the TV and in the streets?”

From what we are constantly told, the jab can mitigate symptoms and help avoid death if one gets Covid-19 – though it cannot provide immunity and its efficacy is temporary, and there is a risk of adverse events.

I am far more afraid of the massive authoritarian response, including partisan media blackouts on the adverse events associated with this experimental drug, and a growing pattern of discrimination against those who retain freedom of medical choice, promoted by the corrupt media, than the disease itself.

I am more afraid of irrational scapegoating and mass violence, promoted by the media, than a disease from which I have a 99% chance of recovery.

Globalists employ instrumental reason, seeing us a collateral damage for the sake of achieving their political objective of a perfect society run by them.

As noted earlier, this misuse of reason runs contrary to the Kantian Formula of Humanity. Globalists are willing to sacrifice many lives to achieve this — including the lives of children — which I have elsewhere compared to the ancient practice of sacrificing children to Baal in the Hebrew Bible.

From a Biblical perspective, this madness is driven by the sin of pride and idolatry. The remedy is to follow the Great Commandment: love God and one another. And end this madness, as they’ve done in Denmark (bless those leaders there).

Natural immunity is better

The jab is not a solution. Natural immunity seems preferable. Vegans tend to have strong immunity, for example. I have not had the flu in about 20 years – roughly the timespan of adopting a plant-based diet.

If I got CV19, I’d take Ivermectin and Vitamin D, after which I’d have natural immunity and would not have to worry about it anymore. I would not under any circumstances take the jab, because I don’t’ know what the long-term effects of its cytotoxin are. No one does, including those pushing the jab through relentless propaganda.

Take Vitamin D and/or Ivermectin and exercise and eat healthy (a whole food plant-based diet). For instance, “Increased fruit and vegetable consumption improves antibody response to vaccination in older people.”

A wholth-foods plant-based diet won’t prevent a person from catching Covid-19, but it will mitigate its harsher effects, due to a strong immune systems: “a vegan or plant-based diet cannot prevent a person from developing COVID-19, but it may help support a healthy immune system. This in turn could aid in SARS-CoV-2 infection prevention and lower the risk of severe symptoms.”

This is a more thorough report on what can be done other than using mRNA vaccines.

The two children’s book from Pfizer

Shaman’s Magic Dream


Sophie’s Science Project


Shaman’s Magic Dream an oddly colonial tale (for this day and age of political correctness), the scientists are pictured as white European men visiting a native child in the Amazon and giving him the experimental drug. The scientists:

NB – it`s harmful to the animals being tested

Yes, nanotechnology will be used in the future. Pfizer admits it in their children’s book. This is what the critics of transhumanism were afraid of.

And we’ll all be forced to take them, like the Borg in Star Trek. We will be forced to become one with the collective. The ‘fact-checkers dismiss this as a conspiracy theory — but much that has been called that and dismissed later came true. This will as well.

It’s just getting more bizarre and dystopian all the time. But it’s a real, being imposed on us. What’s really frightening is how many otherwise intelligent people believe the MSM propaganda.

A former friend tells me that it’s my moral duty to wear a mask and get injected with an experimental drug — a drug that may have killed 150,000 Americans, for a disease I have a 99% chance of recovery from, and which as a vegan I’m not likely to get: my immune system is quite strong from roughly 20 years of a plant-based diet and I’ve not had the flu in that time.

I now live in a society in which I’m a second-class citizen who is not allowed to the things that others can because I won’t help Pfizer turn a profit.

Anyone who raises concerns over the vaccines is called a ‘conspiracy theorist’ — but some evil conspiracies are real.

Back in the 1930s if you said Stalin was murdering millions, you were also called a conspiracy theorist, as Orwell found out. Orwell could not get his non-fiction book Homage to Catalonia published in the Leftist press in the UK because it exposed the Communists and the “Soviet myth.”

So being frustrated by this he turned to novel-writing instead: “Because of the book’s criticism of the Stalinists in Spain, it was rejected by Gollancz, who had previously published all Orwell’s books: “Gollancz is … part of the Communism-racket,” Orwell wrote in 1937.

The same kind of censorship is happening now, but on a far more vast scale, on social media and via ‘hate speech’ legislation.

Homage to Catalonia, Cover, 1st Edition.jpg


Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s