First there was this story: Southwest airlines cancels thousands of flights, claiming bad weather, but the timing is suspicious: pilots filed a vaccine mandate lawsuit one day earlier. Apparently, many (hundreds? thousands?) of pilots did not show up for work after the federal mandate was imposed, the story says. A thousand flights were cancelled. The airline said it was weather but the day before: “Southwest Airlines Co. pilots asked a court to temporarily block the company from carrying out federally mandated coronavirus vaccinations until an existing lawsuit over alleged U.S. labor law violations is resolved.
In a related story, ““““27 U.S. Air Force pilots resign over vaccine mandate. Then the inevitable ‘fact-checkers’ (who work for Big Pharma) chimed in, claiming that never happened. These so-called “fact checkers” are straight out of Orwell’s Ministry of Truth, in the novel 1984. In other words, their job is to lie. In that novel, the protagonist notices that “the leaders of Oceania suddenly announce that Oceania is no longer at war with Eurasia but instead with Eastasia.”
How then did the proles reconcile the sudden shift in alliances by the state? Through what is termed doublethink, or cognitive dissonance. We are not expected to balance two conflicting pieces of information in the same way, e.g., why is it called a pandemic when the mortality rate is so low? How can reputable scientists question the ‘vaccine’? How can it be “safe” if it kills people? How can it be “misinformation” and “racist” to say Covid-19 is from China in 2020 when the evidence points to it? And how is it necessary for young people when their recovery rate is 99.997% The list of discrepancies goes on.
Then the social media companies censor so-called misinformation, based on what the fact-checkers allege is truth and falsehood. Then the Babylon Bee did a spoof on the whole thing: Southwest Airlines offering free flights to all passengers who are vaccinated and can fly a plane.
In a related story: there is a lack of healthcare workers due to the fact that so many have quite rather than submit to the mandate. How many people overall have quite due to the mandate (mostly in the U.S.)? It’s hard to say, but it’s tens of thousands. It’s definitely creating a two-tiered society, much like that showing the dystopian films Code 46, and Automata. It also adds the far greater number of workers who’ve been employed due to the following:
(i) Free trade resulting in loss of manufacturing jobs
(ii) Robotics replacing jobs (as predicted by Theodore Kaczynski)
(iii) Disincentives to working by welfare state (e.g. UBI)
And now (v) Vaccine mandates making people lose their jobs.
This is really a form of violence, inasmuch as the deliberate imposition of poverty is violence. Medical tyranny is violence. It harms people, it marginalize them, it discriminates against them.
What will the world look like in fifty years if there is a huge mass of permanently unemployed people who are controlled by an authoritarian technology?
The great mass of people will be deemed “non-essential” and expendable. We already got a state of that in 2020 with the first of many lockdowns.
This dividing people into essential and non-essential, vaccinated and unvaccinated — all within two years — is intended to divide, disrepute and demoralize us. It’s an act of war by those doing it on those to whom it’s being done.
Some argue that the vaccines themselves are designed to kill us somehow. I am more persuaded by the argument that they’re meant to impose a Chinese social credit system that will be used to segregate those willing to obey from those who pose a threat to the new regime. We see that already in the talk of the unvaccinated and Trump voters as potential “insurrectionists” and “domestic terrorists.”
If this goes further, I think we can expect to see arrests and murders by the state. Let us hope that cooler heads will prevail.
A limited argument FOR vaccines:
Real vaccines, e.g., polio vaccine, are ethically permissible, it can certainly be argued. That’s not the basis for protest right now. These are not “anti-vaxxer” protests. Medical tyranny — forcing it on people is the contentious issue.
Giving people experimental drugs that can harm them is not ethically sound. People need to decide for themselves, and their medical information should stay private.
If they develop the Covid vaccine 2.0 that has no safety issue and people choose to take it, that’s okay too. The first generation of them is flawed.
Moreover, it’s not for everyone: the benefit of taking the Covid vaccine for those over age 65 can be shown to outweigh the risk in most case, but it should still be the choice of the individual. That’s a gamble they should take of their own volition; it should not be forced on them.
Vaccine passports and mandates are completely unacceptable; they are violations of inviolable and inalienable human rights.
As for those under 65, it’s not worth the risk, given the numbers, even if the utilitarian argument could be justified. It’s certainly not warranted for children or teens or pregnant women.
For it to meet ethical standards, it must be voluntary and safe, and designated for appropriate groups. None of that is happening now.
China’s next bioweapon and how the U.S. is helping build it
by Lawrence Sellin and Anna Chen, Aug. 7, 2021
U.S. virus research laboratories have become functioning subsidiaries of China’s biowarfare program.
Since the 1990s, U.S. universities and research institutions have been colonized by Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and People’s Liberation Army (PLA) scientists.
Through a process we call “scientific chain migration,” the first wave of CCP and PLA scientists, once established in laboratories in the U.S., invite their colleagues, who now have created a critical mass of CCP and PLA scientists in the U.S. collaborating with scientists in China linked to its biowarfare program, all supplemented with U.S. funding, skills and knowledge.
Leveraging its extensive, integrated military-civilian biowarfare program, Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) scientists supervised the creation of the genetically-engineered COVID-19 coronavirus capable of multiple pathological effects beyond that of naturally-occurring respiratory viruses, one also pre-adapted for human infection.
According to Dr. Li-Meng Yan’s second report, the COVID-19 virus succeeded in fulfilling the criteria of an effective bioweapon as described in 2005 by PLA General Rui-fu Yang:
- It is significantly virulent and can cause large scale casualties.
- It is highly contagious and transmits easily, often through respiratory routes in the form of aerosols. The most dangerous scenario would be that it allows for human-to-human transmission.
- It is relatively resistant to environmental changes, can sustain transportation, and is capable of supporting targeted [military] release.
In 2010, General Rui-fu Yang together with three of his senior PLA colleagues Zhi-Kai Xu, Zhong-Tian Qi and Fu-Quan Hu wrote that the new era required a military microbiology strategy that “should strive to cultivate and bring up a team of scientific and technological talents with strong innovation ability” regarding “pathogenic substances, pathogenic mechanisms and immune mechanisms of important pathogenic microorganisms” “including the construction and management of high-level biosafety laboratories” for research related to “biological warfare.”
They placed a special emphasis on flaviviruses and its envelope protein that “contains many single amino acids that affect viral neurovirulence and neuro-invasiveness.”
It is important to note that the envelope protein of the COVID-19 virus is believed to be related to its effect on the central nervous system, for example, the early loss of taste and smell. Perhaps, it was a test of concept for future bioweapons.
Flaviviruses are RNA viruses like coronavirus, but are far more dangerous attacking the central nervous system. They include yellow fever, Japanese encephalitis, West Nile, dengue fever and, finally, Zika virus, which is known for infecting pregnant women and causing severe brain damage in their babies.
Although flaviviruses are usually only transmitted by mosquitoes or other insects and are diseases not common in the United States, the PLA may be in the process of changing that situation.
The PLA has long had an extensive flavivirus military-civilian research program, which uses genetic engineering to create new combination viruses such as a combined Japanese encephalitis-Zika virus and conducts “gain of function” experiments, also using genetic engineering, making native Zika viruses more infectious.
The PLA has also shown a keen interest in and has conducted numerous studies on the American strain of Zika virus.
The types of experiments on flaviviruses now underway by the PLA are similar to those that were done for the creation of COVID-19.
PLA scientists have already begun studies on possible human-to human transmission of Zika virus via intranasal inoculation of non-human primates and the transmission between animals in close proximity.
Similar research on aerosol and contact transmission following intranasal infection of mice with Japanese Encephalitis Virus have been conducted by scientists in China.
Viral modifications could make a mosquito-transmitted flavivirus more deadly in a point attack or, using genetic engineering and other “gain of function” techniques, it would be a relatively small step to enhance their human-to-human infectivity.
China has made huge strides in flavivirus research by exploiting its multilayered, fused military-civilian biowarfare program of concurrent pathogen and vaccine development including the contributions made by numerous China-trained scientists operating in U.S. research centers.
Overall, China’s massive biowarfare program operates at three levels.
There is a core secret military level composed of military research centers and hospitals.
The second level includes all universities and “civilian” research centers, like the Wuhan Institute of Virology, because in China there is no difference between military and civilian research.
The fusion of civilian and military research was mandated by the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Thirteenth Five Year Plan in 2016.
That second level allows the core secret military level to access knowledge and skills from the third level of China’s biowarfare program, international universities and research centers, particularly those in the U.S.
The organization of China’s flavivirus biowarfare program illustrates the fusion of military and civilian research and its links to U.S. personnel and resources as shown in the following images.
Level 1 – Core, secret military bioweapons program.
Level 2 – Chinese universities and civilian research centers.
Level 3 – CCP and PLA scientists in the U.S. conducting ongoing research with colleagues in the People’s Republic of China.
The extensive research links between Pei-Yong Shi of the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army have been described in detail in earlier Gateway Pundit articles, here and here.
Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is retired from an international career in business and medical research with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. His email address is email@example.com.