Another young man died from a heart condition brought on by the jab (story below). There have been many such cases.
Death as an ‘adverse events’ for all groups is in the thousands — though how many thousand is hard to say as the number for the U.S. varies from 6,000 to 150,000.
The pharmaceutical companies get away with it because laws were put in place to exempt them from liability.
They argue that VAERs reports of injury do not prove causal correlation. Yet in many cases where no pre-existing poor health existed, it must be so.
There has been a sharp rise in VAERs reports. VAERs numbers are a political hot potato, their veracity widely contested. There is also a claim that 99% of adverse events go unreported.
The mainstream media is not reporting these “adverse events” – so it is left up to independent media to do so.
Here are some of ‘adverse events’ which have occurred worldwide:
Those 0 to 19 in age have a 99.997% recovery rate from Covid-19, according to the CDC. So basically they’re immune to it.
At the same time, there’s an FDA report that says there’s an 86% incidence of adverse events — some quite bad — for children taking the Pfizer jab. See article below. And see my previous report on this issue here.
To quote the FDA report itself (p. 23):
“In clinical studies of participants 16 years of age and older, adverse reactions following administration of the primary series included pain at the injection site (84.1%), fatigue (62.9%), headache (55.1%), muscle pain (38.3%), chills (31.9%), joint pain (23.6%), fever (14.2%), injection site swelling (10.5%), injection site redness (9.5%), nausea (1.1%), malaise (0.5%), and lymphadenopathy (0.3%).
“In a clinical study in adolescents 12 through 15 years of age, adverse reactions following administration of the primary series included pain at the injection site (90.5%), fatigue (77.5%), headache (75.5%), chills (49.2%), muscle pain (42.2%), fever (24.3%), joint pain (20.2%), injection site swelling (9.2%), injection site redness (8.6%), lymphadenopathy (0.8%), and nausea (0.4%).
“In a clinical study of participants 18 through 55 years of age, the most commonly reported adverse reactions (≥10%) following administration of a booster dose were pain at the injection site (83.0%), fatigue (63.7%), headache (48.4%), muscle pain (39.1%), chills (29.1%), and joint pain (25.3%).
“Severe allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, have been reported following administration of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine outside of clinical trials. Myocarditis and pericarditis have been reported following administration of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine outside of clinical trials.”
Now Pfizer wants to give 5 to 11-year-old children the jab, in the U.S. and Canada, despite the terrible results of the clinical trials.
Children don’t need it and it’s dangerous for them. So why would it even be considered?
It could have something to do with boosting pharmaceutical profits. And it’s also useful politically for some people who benefit from this new regime.
But the bottom line is that it’s not healthy for children and should not be happening. If people can’t see how wrong all this is — poisoning children for profit — I’m not sure what will wake them up.
Healthy 16 Year-Old Boy Drops DEAD During Virtual Class, Mom Blames Pfizer’s COVID Vaccine
“microvascular injury to the brain, heart, liver, and kidneys in a way that does not currently appear to be assessed in safety trials of these potential drugs.”
by James Sampson, Oct. , Red State Media
A 16-year-old boy from California who was in perfect health reportedly died during an online class after receiving the second dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine.
The boy’s mother filed a report with the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which is run by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), on July 13 alleging that her son passed away 27 days after receiving his second dose of Pfizer’s experimental COVID-19 vaccine in April.
“My son died while taking his math class on Zoom. We are waiting for the autopsy because the doctors did not find anything,” the mother wrote in her report. “He was a healthy boy, he had a good academic index, he wanted to be a civil engineer. He was the best thing in my life.”
“He had no previous symptoms. I was with him one hour before, and my assistant saw him 20 minutes prior, and he did not show any irregularities,” she added in the “Diagnostic Lab Data” section of the VAERS entry.
The boy reportedly got the second dose of the vaccine on April 3 and then died on April 27. His mother stated that he had not been diagnosed with any allergies, pre-existing conditions, illnesses, disabilities, or birth defects. He also was not taking any medications at the time of his death. The teenager spent eight days in the hospital, and it is unclear if he attended the Zoom class from there or was released before his death.
The media has been trying to sweep reports of children being harmed or killed by the coronavirus vaccines under the rug for months now.
The Children’s Health Defense looked at the preliminary data surrounding the vaccination of children against COVID-19 back in June. It found that “for those 12-17 years of age, the risk of developing myocarditis/pericarditis within seven days of receiving the second dose is 32 times greater than expected for males and 9.5 times greater for females.”
For young adults between the ages of 18 and 24, the increased risk of developing myocarditis and pericarditis goes up 27 times greater than expected for males.
Dr. Patrick Whelan, a pediatric specialist, caring for children with the multisystem inflammatory syndrome, spoke out recently to warn that the spike protein found in the vaccines is of special concern for young people because it is a potentially lethal toxin that causes “microvascular injury to the brain, heart, liver, and kidneys in a way that does not currently appear to be assessed in safety trials of these potential drugs.”
The FDA granted emergency use authorisation of the Pfizer mRNA Covid vaccine for use in children aged 12 and over in the USA back on the 10th May 2021. The EMA has recently followed suit, recommending the Pfizer jab should be administered to children aged 12 and over in EU countries.
Because of this there can be no doubt that the MHRA will follow the FDA and EMA’s lead and also grant emergency use authorisation of the Pfizer jab for use in children aged 12 and above.
But are you aware that the clinical trials carried out by Pfizer on children aged 12 – 15 reveal that 86% of children who were given at least one dose of the jab suffered an adverse reaction ranging from mild to serious?
The information is publicly available and contained within an FDA fact sheet which can be viewed here (see page 25, table 5 on-wards).
That fact sheet contains two tables that detail the alarming rate of side effects and damage experienced by 12 – 15- year-old children who were given at least one dose of the Pfizer mRNA “vaccine” (gene therapy).
The tables shows that 1,127 children were given one dose of the mRNA jab, but only 1,097 children received the second dose. This fact in itself raises questions as to why 30 children did not receive a second dose of the Pfizer jab, and we doubt the answer is pretty.
Of the 1,127 children who received a first dose of the jab a shocking 86% experienced an adverse reaction. Of the 1,097 children who received a second dose of the jab a shocking 78.9% experienced an adverse reaction.
Table 6 within the FDA fact sheet shows that 20.3% of the 1,127 children who received a first dose of the Pfizer jab experienced fever, meanwhile 39.3% of the 1,097 children who received a second dose experienced fever.
Another 60.1% of the children who received the first dose also experienced fatigue, whilst 66% of those who received a second dose experienced fatigue.
Another 55.3% of the children who received the first dose also experienced a headache, and 64.5% of those who received a second dose also experienced a headache.
27.6% of the children who recieved the first dose also experienced chills, whilst 41.5% of the children who received a second dose experienced chills. 2.8% of the children who received a first dose experienced vomiting, whilst 2.6% of the children who received a second dose experienced vomiting.
The final specific adverse reaction that the FDA list is diarrhoea. Of the 1,127 children who received the first dose 8.0% suffered with diarrhoea. Of the 1,097 children who received a 2nd dose 5.9% experienced diarrhoea.
It’s shocking to find that even after 86% of children reported an adverse reaction after the first dose that the study was allowed to proceed and the same children were given a second dose of the jab.
The FDA document also states that 0.04% suffered an extremely serious adverse reaction but does not go in to detail on the type of reactions that occurred. 0.04% may sound small but lets put this into perspective. In the United Kingdom there are approximately 4 million children aged between 12 – 15-years-old. If every single one of these children were to receive just one dose of the Pfizer mRNA jab then according to the study we can expect to see 1,600 suffer an extremely serious adverse reaction which could include death.
But if this then extends to children under the age of 12 and a similar rate of extremely serious adverse reaction occurs then we can expect to see that number increase to around 5,200.
However we cannot forget that the study shows that 86% of recipients suffered an adverse reaction. This means that if just 12-15-year-old’s are given one dose of the Pfizer jab we can expect to see 3.4 million of them suffer an adverse reaction.
When comparing this rate against the actual risk of children even mildly suffering from the alleged Covid-19 disease we are bewildered at how medicine regulators have concluded that the benefits of these experimental vaccines outweigh the risks.
And these are experimental vaccines, the FDA document even tells the public this in which it states the following –
‘The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is an unapproved vaccine that may prevent COVID-19. There is no FDA-approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19. The FDA has authorized the emergency use of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to prevent COVID-19 in individuals 12 years of age and older under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).‘
The FDA also confirms in their fact sheet that the Pfizer jab (alongside all other Covid jabs) is still in clinical trials –
‘Serious and unexpected side effects may occur. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is still being studied in clinical trials.‘
They are coming for your children. Your silence and compliance has allowed this to happen. Any rational person, after reading this “fact sheet” from the FDA, would surely find the courage to say “enough is enough”?
Please share this widely so parents across the United Kingdom, Europe, and the United States can make an informed decision for their children.
A pro-vaccine group of physicians calling itself “America’s Frontline Doctors” has filed a request for a temporary restraining order against the emergency use of Covid-19 vaccines in children under age 16.
U.S. public health officials are recommending Covid-19 vaccine as safe and effective for all age groups. They say that vaccine adverse events being examined, so far, are not concerning, and that the benefits of vaccination outweighs the risks.
However, the founder of America’s Frontline Doctors, Dr. Simone Gold, says that is not true for all age groups and individuals. She points to statistics showing that the risk of Covid-19 death for kids age 0-17 is 99.997% or “statistically zero.” On the other hand, Gold says, “some unknown percentage” of children “will suffer” side effects from Covid-19 vaccines.
Current Moderna and Pfizer studies for their vaccines are scheduled to be completed Oct. 31, 2022 and April 27, 2022 respectively. However, there is discussion of the government approving the vaccines outside emergency use prior to completion of the studies.
Gold says the group of doctors “will not be silent while Americans are used as guinea pigs for a virus with survivability of 99.8% globally and 99.97% under age 70.”
The CDC has said getting kids vaccinated against Covid-19 will help keep them from spreading it to adults.
However, studies indicate that transmission from children to adults is “infrequent.”
According to a report in the journal Pediatrics: “In France, a 9-year-old boy with respiratory symptoms associated with picornavirus, influenza A, and SARS-CoV-2 coinfection was found to have exposed over 80 classmates at 3 schools; no secondary contacts became infected, despite numerous influenza infections within the schools… In New South Wales, Australia, 9 students and 9 staff infected with SARS-CoV-2 across 15 schools had close contact with a total of 735 students and 128 staff.10 Only 2 secondary infections were identified, none in adult staff; 1 student in primary school was potentially infected by a staff member, and 1 student in high school was potentially infected via exposure to 2 infected schoolmates.”
How long each Covid-19 vaccine provides immunity is unknown. The side effects of the vaccines are being gathered and studied, but it’s too soon to have the complete picture.
Health officials around the world are examining reports after Covid-19 vaccine of brain blood clots, particularly in females; heart injury, particularly in young boys; death in the fail elderly; and other possible adverse events.
There are varying analyses as to what each vaccine may or may not be responsible for. In the U.S., officials and vaccine makers say many of the side effects and deaths reported are coincidental and not related to the vaccines.
A warning was added to the Johnson and Johnson Covid-19 vaccine after reports of blood clots with low platelets in some women who had been vaccinated.
America’s Frontline Doctors
“Based on the law and scientific evidence, the [Emergency Use Authorizations] should never have been granted…should be revoked immediately, the injections are dangerous biological agents that have the potential to cause substantially greater harm than the COVID-19 disease itself…”
America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) today filed a motion in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama requesting a temporary restraining order against the emergency use authorization (EUA) permitting using the COVID-19 vaccines in children under the age of 16, and that no further expansion of the EUAs to children under the age of 16 be granted prior to the resolution of these issues at trial.
The case will challenge the EUAs for the injections on several counts, based on the law and scientific evidence that the EUAs should never have been granted, the EUAs should be revoked immediately, the injections are dangerous biological agents that have the potential to cause substantially greater harm than the COVID-19 disease itself, and that numerous laws have been broken in the process of granting these EUAs and foisting these injections on the American people.
AFLDS Founder Dr. Simone Gold spoke about the reasons for filing the motion: “We doctors are pro-vaccine, but this is not a vaccine,” she said. “This is an experimental biological agent whose harms are well-documented (although suppressed and censored) and growing rapidly, and we will not support using America’s children as guinea pigs.”
She continued: “We insist that the EUA not be relinquished prematurely; certainly not before trials are complete – October 31, 2022 for Moderna and April 27, 2023 for Pfizer. We are shocked at the mere discussion of this, and will not be silent while Americans are used as guinea pigs for a virus with survivability of 99.8% globally and 99.97% under age 70.
“Under age 20 it is 99.997% – ‘statistical zero’.
“There are 104 children age 0-17 who died from COVID-19 and 287 from COVID + Influenza – out of ~72 million. This equals zero risk. And we doctors won’t stand for children being offered something they do not need and of whom some unknown percentage will suffer.”
AFLDS Pediatric Director Dr. Angie Farella explained: “My greatest concerns with the vaccination of children under the age of 18 is the fact that there is no prior study of these individuals before December of 2020.”
She went on to say: “Children were not included in the trials, and the adult trials do not have any long-term safety data currently available.”
AFLDS Legal Director Ali Shultz commented on AFLDS’ filing: “Not many people could have taken this on. Dr. Simone Gold is a doctor, and a lawyer, and a fierce warrior who will stop at nothing to protect humanity.
“She has a certain finesse in developing the right team to see this medical/legal mission through.”
To read the motion and all supporting documents, click here.